Age. (1985)patibility when you look at the father or mother-infant matchmaking: Roots and operations

Mutton, Meters. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict matchmaking (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Imagined similarity and you may relationships profits one of relationships partners: An idiographic method

Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). If I am not scorching, are you presently hot or otherwise not?: Physical-appeal ratings and relationship tastes just like the a function of your individual attractiveness. Mental Science, 19, 669677. [ Links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic matchmaking. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of ambition. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Character while the decisions disorders (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Force. [ Hyperlinks ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Anticipating relationship relationships destiny with insiders’ and you will outsiders’ perspective: Whom and what is asked issues. Private Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you may relationship high quality in newly weds: Several situated strategy. Journal away from Identity and you can Public Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]

Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, An excellent. (2006). Matchmaking. Washington, DC: Declaration with the Pew Sites & American Lifetime Enterprise. Recovered , out-of [ Hyperlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Assessing the accuracy from predictions from the dating relationships: How and exactly why carry out lovers’ forecasts differ from the individuals produced by observers? Personality and you can Societal Mindset Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Hyperlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing factors in the initiation of heterosexual matchmaking. Paper exhibited in the First Worldwide Meeting towards the Personal Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Links ]

Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.An excellent. (2000). Electronic relationship and you can digital related: Conceptualizing desktop mediated close dating. Household members, 44, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, R. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try actual similarity essential for interest? A beneficial meta-data off actual and understood similarity. Diary regarding Personal and personal Relationship, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Website links ]

Morry, Yards. M. (2005). Relationships satisfaction given that a good predictor of resemblance ratings; An examination of your own interest-similarity hypothesis. https://internationalwomen.net/sv/brittiska-kvinnor/ Diary regarding Societal and personal Relationships, twenty two, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Diary from Personal and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880

Morry, M. M. (2007). New attraction-similarity hypothesis certainly get across-sex household members: Dating pleasure, perceived parallels, and you will notice-helping thinking. Journal out-of Societal and personal Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Links ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and expansion of your own SVR concept of dyadic pairing. Record from ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can divorce case: A good 14-12 months longitudinal study of black lovers and you can white partners. Diary from Personal and personal Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]

Orenstein, S. (). Brand new like formula Fits thinks this has discovered a formula to own ruling the internet relationship providers: A technical strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Proper. Company 2.0 Mag. Recovered into the of [ Links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure — Character similarities inside partners. Personality and you can Private Differences, 45, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Mate tastes: Just what services create folk appeal within their brief-term sexual and you will enough time-term personal lovers? Diary out of Mindset and you may Person Sexuality, several, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). This new part of the thinking on the initiation and you will span of societal correspondence. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]